thebeespatella: (Default)
Text from this Twitter thread.

Okay, turns out I’m more irritated about this than I thought. If you are an RPF fandom writer considering collaborating with Ch 4:

I understand that it can feel fun, interesting, or flattering that they asked you to participate. It can feel like validation that your writing is good, that it’s legitimate. Notwithstanding that what makes fandom good is its “illegitimate” nature, I hate to break it to you: they’re not interested in your writing as a craft or as art.

They’re here to make money. It’s not like you and your friends working together on a chatfic. They are not interested in “collaborating” with you because they want a true creative partnership or because they’re interested in your writing in any meaningful way, even just as fun in the way you think it’s fun.

They HAVE to get you to make new material to limit their legal liability. That’s it. If they could just steal your work without violating copyright law, they would. AO3 hosts your work and acts as a publisher, but you own the copyright over your own work by default.

Any “collaboration” would necessarily cede editorial control to Ch 4 since you’re making it “for” them. And what are they interested in? I can only speculate, but am pretty confident that it’ll be whatever will elicit the best reactions during the show.

Whatever will be the funniest, most embarrassing, or shocking. It’s not going to be a roundtable where you talk about your writing. At the end of the show, they will ask for “a round of applause for our dedicated writers!” after spending 30 minutes laughing at your work.

People will clap because it’s rude not to, and then they’ll cut to the title card and they’ll keep laughing at you.

I don’t mean to say that everyone involved in this show is hellbent on cruelty, or actively wants to humiliate people just for kicks, but that the very nature of the show prohibits it from having any other end result.

Even the most game, open-minded, well-intentioned comedian has one goal: to make people laugh. It's hard enough when celebrities are randomly confronted with RPF on late-night talk shows. But to make "re-enact fanfiction with puppets" the plan for every episode?

They are asking you to make a spectacle of yourself. Even if your fic is “just a bit of fun,” are you truly comfortable with that? If they really wanted to “celebrate” fic they could have these comedians write their own and bring it in. They could write it themselves.

Instead, they’re going to use the fig leaf of your “weirdness” to protect them from the brunt of the criticism, as a third party that offers them plausible deniability.

You will only get paid if they use your work, and as I understand it, works will all be edited together, so if you’re tempted by the notion of “exposure,” a) your work will not be distinct from anyone else’s, at best you could say you “contributed.”

Also, this is your business, but I am curious as to what kind of professional benefits you think you'll reap from "I contributed to a puppet re-enactment of Jimmy Carr omegaverse porn" or whatever

Speaking of being paid: you will have to sign a contract. It’s not going to be like P@treon or getting tips. You’re going to have to sign a contract with your legal name. So, if you’re ready to doxx yourself, have at it, I guess.

Finally, there are all the fandom-related intangibles. We’re not in fandom just because we like something a lot, or because we love to write or make art. We’re in fandom because we wanted to do all of those things together. We wanted to make and be in a community.

In my experience, this community has welcomed those in need of it the most: the queer, the curious, the disabled, the closeted. Those of us who are too loud, who love things too much for the people around us. Those of us who have been mocked for the strength of our love.

Those of us who were too loud, who loved too much; those of us who burned with a feeling of difference that we didn’t, maybe still don’t, have a name for, but that illuminates our days with its flickering cast.
Those of us who are just plain lonely.

The point is not only that this community is comprised largely of people who are marginalized in some way or another, although that is, of course, significant, but that you don’t have to pay money or take a test or any of the other reductionist quotidian bullshit we deal with.

It doesn't try to take our human qualities and make metrics of them; means-test our worthiness, the way our schools, our jobs, our healthcare; almost everything else in life does. The barrier to entry is: do you love this thing? If so, welcome home.

This kind of generous community is what I have known fandom to be at its very best. I know it doesn’t always live up to its ideals, but that’s no reason not to try. It’s no reason to kick down the door to this rare and beloved alcove.

Whatever profit or fame or other material temptations this opportunity may present you, I promise you, you will never be able to buy back our privacy.
thebeespatella: (Default)

I’m tired of this debate, frankly, of the moral doubt cast on RPF writers, as though what they write is circumscribed by different rules or standards than fandom at large. To begin with, the fiction you write or read is not an arrow on your moral compass. Your behavior is. Apparently, this needs saying in the year of our Lorde 2021. Stop ceding any ground to this argument by leveraging personal squicks as proof that we’re reasonable, thoughtful people, or whatever, because it just reads like blackmail to your friends and followers who might enjoy the content you abhor. The argument that you’re an irredeemable sinner incapable of complex critical thought if you read x or y is prima facie incorrect. The end.


So I get real fucking annoyed when I see the scolding and the finger-wagging, “But you have to remember to respect people’s boundaries!!” directed specifically at RPF writers, as though they’re a group of compulsive flashers who just can’t help whipping open their digital trenchcoats at unsuspecting celebrities.


This scolding seems specially reserved for RPF authors when really, not respecting boundaries is just bad behavior. If someone asks an inappropriate question of an actor at a con, we don’t sit around and debate whether cons are okay. That person behaved badly. The main offenders of showing RPF to public figures are, largely, journalists who get a kick out of embarrassing their interview subjects at the expense of some writer’s innocuous hobby. Fandom etiquette is broadly applicable to all fandoms, and when someone breaches the protocol, it’s the fault of the individual, not the fault of the medium. (There’s a tendency to frame individual faults as big questions of “discourse’ rather than asking for accountability, but that’s another topic).


Another point I see thrown around is something along the lines of, “But what if they find it?”


If they find it: Well, then, that might be embarrassing, especially if they choose to make it public, but that’s not a moral failing on the part of the writer. The public figure went looking for it on their own steam, same as, presumably, they could search their own names on Twitter, go through their mentions, and turn up thousands of thirst Tweets, which are not overlaid with the soft patina of fiction. Just unfettered horniness without narrative except raw want. Not that there’s anything wrong with a thirst Tweet. Buzzfeed’s made it a whole video series to have actors read thirst tweets about them out loud. They make money off it. So if your problem is access, I have bad news for you. Also, if you can't handle being embarrassed, I have even worse news for you, generally.

Read more... )

Profile

thebeespatella: (Default)
thebeespatella

July 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 10:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios